TAO makes TAO waste! Messari researcher dissects Bittensor's network effects
Original article: "Breaking Down Bittensor's Network Effects" Author: Seth Bloomberg (Messari Researcher) Compiled: Zombie Messari Researcher Seth Bloomberg recently published an article on X, detailing the network effects of Bittensor and potential bottlenecks for future development.
The following is the original compilation:
Due to the recent discussions about Bittensor, I would like to share my views and some concerns about it.
Thanks to Saypien (former Messari executive) for the extensive discussion on this topic, and also thanks to Sami Kassab (former Messari researcher), I know he will come to point out my mistakes here.
A basic layer network must establish network effects to succeed, in order to attract and retain users and developers. For smart contract platforms like Ethereum, network effects come from on chain liquidity and stable execution capabilities. For Bittensor, its current network effects come from:
1) Familiar with AI/ML developers who mine on the internet (i.e. developers who create AI models and services);
2) A deep liquidity TAO market that can absorb the selling pressure of tokens. Usually, less mature networks are more susceptible to token selling pressure.
Due to the widespread applicability of (2) to most encrypted networks, I will primarily focus on (1). Specifically, the network effect or flywheel effect generated by (1) is as follows: the new subnet benefits from experienced AI/ML Bittensor developers who continuously produce high-quality results → AI/ML engineers benefit from continuous TAO token issuances. It can be expected that the revenue from TAO tokens, combined with Bittensor's AI/ML talent, will continue to attract more subnet builders, thereby attracting more AI/ML talent and forming a cycle.
Whether you are bearish or bullish on TAO, it is worth exploring how this network effect may collapse. So, let's get started.
Scenario 1: TAO token revenue<operating expenses
AI/ML talents are attracted to the internet because the TAO token returns they receive exceed their operating costs on Bittensor. Mathematics is simple: there is no need to raise a large amount of funds, acquire customers, or generate income. Just integrate the model into Bittensor's subnet and earn TAO token issuance revenue. The assumption of this model is that your earnings (based on current or expected TAO value) should be able to cover your expenses denominated in US dollars. If this account is not established, AI/ML talents will choose to leave Bittensor and seek other opportunities.
Scenario 2: Opportunity Cost Calculation
Imagine you are a skilled AI/ML developer on Bittensor, or you are a small team of two or three AI/ML developers building projects on Bittensor. At some point, you have to ask yourself: 'What is the opportunity cost of continuing to be a miner here?' Well, you know the upside benefits of staying on Bittensor only come from the issuance of TAO tokens and the rise in TAO token prices. With the benefits on this side, you also need to consider the other side: whether creating a new protocol without Bittensor can bring greater benefits? I know... this may be considered 'blasphemy' for some people, but if you don't consider this, then you're not taking responsibility for yourself.
Bittensor has realized the need to provide additional incentive benefits for subnets and their miners. 'Dynamic TAO' seems to be their approved solution.
It is currently running on the testing network, so it is likely to be launched by the end of this year or early next year. Through dynamic TAO, each subnet will have a fund pool similar to Uniswap V2, which will pair and price subnet tokens with TAO. The 'dynamic' aspect of this upgrade lies in the new dynamic TAO token issuance model: the more TAOs pledged in the fund pool, the more TAO tokens allocated to subnets, and the higher the price of subnet tokens. It sounds very cost-effective. AI developers can gain appreciation of subnet tokens while retaining their advantage in the Bittensor ecosystem (i.e. TAO token issuance).
However, pairing subnet tokens with TAO for pricing will set an "artificial upper limit" on the valuation of individual subnet tokens. Ethereum and its L2 or Helium and its subDAOs also have similar token dynamic relationships. This is where opportunity cost calculation comes into play. If you are one of these powerful AI/ML developers or subnet owners, why limit yourself in the way mentioned above? Why not just establish your own protocol or network? I dare say that some venture capitalists may be eager to fund you after seeing a bunch of mediocre AI and encryption projects, and this valuation may be higher than a rigorously designed subnet. Or even better, you have accumulated a large amount of TAO during mining, and after calculation, you believe that you can self fund to establish your own protocol, attract some applications, users, and revenue, and then consider external funding (which is rare today).
In my opinion, this is the long-term challenge Bittensor needs to face - designing mechanisms, incentives, and ecosystems to retain the best AI/ML talent.
I think a recent tweet from mrink0 (Delphi Digital researcher) also hinted at this issue (if not, please forgive me for taking it out of context; if there is an error, please correct me). In my opinion, people like Nous (open-source AI research organization Nous Research) leaving Bittensor to build their own networks indicate that for some Bittensor developers, the incentive to stay in Bittensor is currently not enough to compete with building and publishing their own networks.
Addendum:
After mrink0, in Seth Bloomberg's comment section, he pointed out that he agrees with most of Seth Bloomberg's views and stated that the key challenge will be whether Bittensor can attract a model that can solve the problem of people being willing to pay. Otherwise, it will only be (temporary) token emissions.
Seth Bloomberg gave the following response to this:
Even if the model solves the problem of people being willing to pay, miners may not necessarily benefit from it in any way. People will pay for applications or products that use these models, but the protocol does not define any mechanism for miners to share these benefits. The worst-case scenario is that the demand for miners increases (inference costs rise), but they are unable to generate any income from these applications or products. The income of Bittensor miners cannot increase with the demand or revenue of the applications they serve.
(责任编辑:经济数据)
-
比特幣反彈衝上 58,000 美元!NYDIG:短期漲勢難延續,第四季度是關鍵
互联网B2C是什么?就是尽可能让屌丝能够享受VIP待遇,任何一个B2C企业,只要能做到这一点都算成功了。...[详细]
-
你相信什么事儿,我相信什么事儿,如果大家能够碰得上就在一起合作,碰不上就不合作。...[详细]
-
Tokenizer.Estate 通过无缝全球代币化平台点燃房地产的未来
” 即便辛苦,但张兰一天赚的钱能抵在国内一个月的工资,只是心高气傲的张兰并不甘心在异国他乡靠做苦力赚钱,她给自己定下了目标:挣够了2万美元,就回国做生意。...[详细]
-
” 留白 我们常说的留白,或者负空间,是设计师没有放置设计元素的空白区域。...[详细]
-
国内手游用户红利渐触天花板,可开发用户范围逐渐紧缩。...[详细]
-
Meliuz 董事长称比特币就像巴西公司资产负债表上的核反应堆
2013年Padora在泰国成立了研发中心,包括将哥本哈根和米兰的设计师想法在工厂现有技术下落实,同时也参与新技术的研发。...[详细]
-
观众互动产生的群体感、讨论感、共鸣等,成为了作品本身的重要“内容”。...[详细]
-
如果它仅仅是内容的堆叠,而没有塑造品牌,大概没有人知道它是什么。...[详细]
-
一入电商深似海,从此休息是路人 2013年开始入驻天猫,在此之前,我是一名服装设计师,月薪两万以上,有双休日。...[详细]
-
你要自问,是平台服务还是自营服务能对客户的多快好省利益最大化?如果你的客户痛点是快,为了客户利益,你就可能要做自营,当然同样的客户痛点,也可以用不同的方式解决,例如淘宝是通过商家PK来获得低价,但2B...[详细]